Legal Opinion

Sublett v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1965No. 41338PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiff, individually and in behalf of. all tax-paying.voters of the City of Tulsa similarly situated, brings this proceeding asking this Court to assume original jurisdiction by granting Writ of Injunction. Relief is sought against the named defendants, enjoining each from acting in his individual and official capacity in respect to the matters herein summarized. Only questions of law relating to welfare and right of taxpayers of the City are involved, the pertinent facts involved having been stipulated. Jurisdiction is sought to be invoked under the authority of this Court…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Burkhardt v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API