Legal Opinion

Northampton National Bank v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 18, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The plaintiff brought the present action in the Superior Court for the purpose of securing a declaratory judgment to the effect that the plaintiff’s collecting an annual charge of $5.00 from each of the holders of a BankAmericard credit card issued under the plaintiff’s auspices would not be in violation of the provisions of the first paragraph of G. L. c. 140, § 114B, as appearing in St. 1973, c. 273, § l. The Attorney General counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment to the contrary and has appealed from a judgment favorable to the plaintiff. The following is a summary of the facts gleaned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fred Fisher, on Behalf of Himself and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. First National Bank of Omaha, Omaha, NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. James W. Partain v. The First National Bank of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Northway Lanes v. Hackley Union National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Greenleaf Finance Co. v. SMALL LOANS REGULATORY BOARDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Copeland v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Greenwood Trust Co. v. Com. of Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Banco de Ponce v. Departamento de Asuntos del ConsumidorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
  5. Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API