Legal Opinion
James W. Partain v. The First National Bank of Montgomery
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 13, 1972No. 72-1207PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTLE, District Judge:
The three plaintiffs, suing for themselves and all other holders of Bank-Americards issued by First National Bank of Montgomery, sued said Bank under 12 U.S.C.A. § 86, alleging that through the use of said credit cards the Bank charged plaintiffs and their class usurious interest. The plaintiffs appeal from rendition of summary judgment against them, D.C., 336 F.Supp. 65. We reverse.
Plaintiffs alleged that during the period of two years next preceding the filing of their complaint in credit card transactions with plaintiffs and others similarly situated the defendant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Robert L. Roper v. Consurve, Inc., D/B/A Bankamericard Center, and Deposit Guaranty National Bank, Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Eli Peritz v. Liberty Loan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- First National Bank in Mena, Cross-Appellee v. Jack A. Nowlin, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.