Legal Opinion

City of Aurora v. Commerce Group Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1984No. 83CA1257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

The City of Aurora (Aurora) appeals the dismissal of its petition to condemn extra-territorially approximately six miles of stream fishing rights over the property of respondents (landowners). The trial court dismissed the case finding no statutory authority for this condemnation proceeding. The trial court chose not to reach the issue whether the proposed condemnation was for a public purpose. Landowner Commerce Group Corporation (CGC) cross-appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its counterclaim for damages upon a theory of “wrongful condemnation.” The trial court ruled that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Loomis v. SeelyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Laessig v. May D & F & American Credit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montezuma Well Service, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Department of Transportation v. StapletonColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. City of Lafayette v. Town of ErieColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API