Legal Opinion
Montezuma Well Service, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1996No. 95CA0793PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TURSI *
Petitioners, the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (CCIA) and the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF), seek review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel determining that the permanent total disability (PTD) benefits payable by petitioners to Billy J. Lackey (claimant) do not terminate when he reaches age 65. In view of the pronouncement in Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Romero, 912 P.2d 62 (Colo.1996) that § 8-42-111(5), C.R.S. (1995 Cum. Supp.) is unconstitutional, the petitioners alternatively challenge the validity of § 8-42-111(4), C.R.S. (1995…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- City of Lakewood v. Colfax Unlimited Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. NguyenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Citizens for Responsible Government State Political Action Committee v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Citizens for Responsible Government State Political Action Committee v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- In re the Marriage of RoddyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Pepper v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- United Airlines v. Industrial Claim Appeals officeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.