State v. Chrisco
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3) (2005), and felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found after a search that occurred during an unlawful stop and in admitting a hearsay report identifying the substance found on him as methamphetamine. We conclude that neither of defendant’s claims of error was preserved in the trial court. State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 343, 15 P3d 22 (2000). The alleged error regarding the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Karl v. Dept of SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2024