Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 2015No. 2013-1955PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This case involves a dispute over the value of a two-family dwelling in Cuyahoga County. Appellant, Fred P. Schwartz, purchased the property from the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) for $5,000 in October 2011. The county fiscal officer valued the property at $126,800 for tax year 2011, and Schwartz sought a reduction to $30,000. The Cuyahoga County Board of Revision (“BOR”) retained the fiscal officer’s valuation, and the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) affirmed.
{¶ 2} Schwartz appealed and now argues that the BTA acted unreasonably and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Crown Communication, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Snavely v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lunn v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Schutz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Morton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Hersh v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Utt v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.