Legal Opinion

Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2010No. 2009-1405PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) in a real property valuation case. The BTA affirmed the reduction ordered by the Hamilton County Board of Revision (“BOR”), which was based on the price paid by Fenco Development Company in a foreclosure sale. The Cincinnati School District Board of Education (“school board”) contends that the sale price was not indicative of value because the foreclosure sale did not qualify as an arm’s-length transaction. Additionally, the school board argues that the corporate taxpayer’s president engaged in the unauthorized…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cummins Property Services, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Olentangy Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. North Royalton City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hilliard City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Health Care REIT, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API