Legal Opinion
Schutz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 2018No. 2015-0288PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
*23 {¶ 1} This case involves residential property located on Berkeley Road in Cleveland Heights and owned by appellant, Alex Schutz. He challenged the tax-year-2012 valuation of the property by appellee Cuyahoga County fiscal officer. Appellee Cuyahoga County Board of Revision ("BOR") rejected his claim, retaining the fiscal officer's valuation, and the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") affirmed. In his appeal here, Schutz contends that the BTA misplaced the burden of proof and did not give proper consideration to the evidence he presented in support of his claim. We affirm the BTA's decision.
Facts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Colonial Village, Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Akron City School District Board of Education v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Orange City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cleveland Mun. School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Gallick v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Balco Realty, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Azar v. Summit Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.