Hemstad v. Hall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of tbe district court for St. Louis county, in favor of defendant, entered in pursuance of tbe order of Moer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
In tbis action tbe jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for one cent. Immediately after tbe verdict was recorded, it was set aside by tbe court of its own motion, and neither party objected thereto. Thereafter defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict, which motion was made on “tbe files, records, proceedings, and testimony herein,” and upon the affidavits of plaintiff’s attorney, in one of which be stated “that, at tbe close of tbe testimony, defendant moved the court for a direction of a verdict as to tbe cause of action set out in the complaint.” Tbe court below granted tbe…
2Cited by11 opinions
- St. Anthony Falls Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- In Re Estate of KinseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Johns v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.