Legal Opinion

State v. Parson

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 23, 1998No. 04-98-00357-CRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

The State appeals the granting of a motion to suppress. The trial court determined that the State did not have probable cause to arrest Alan Parson, that Parson was not in a suspicious place at the time of his arrest, and that there were no exigent circumstances. Consequently, the trial court found that the State was not justified in making a warrant-less arrest under Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 14.03 and 14.04 (Vernon 1977 & Supp.1998) and suppressed the physical evidence obtained as a result of this arrest. Because we find the circumstances sufficient to support a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Loesch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Esco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  2. Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Chilman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Yeager v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API