State v. Parson
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
CATHERINE STONE, Justice.
The State appeals the granting of a motion to suppress. The trial court determined that the State did not have probable cause to arrest Alan Parson, that Parson was not in a suspicious place at the time of his arrest, and that there were no exigent circumstances. Consequently, the trial court found that the State was not justified in making a warrant-less arrest under Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 14.03 and 14.04 (Vernon 1977 & Supp.1998) and suppressed the physical evidence obtained as a result of this arrest. Because we find the circumstances sufficient to support a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Loesch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Esco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Chilman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Yeager v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.