Legal Opinion
Hollis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided February 16, 2007No. 03-04-00550-CRPublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.
Appellant Sargent Hollis appeals his convictions for intentionally and knowingly manufacturing a controlled substance, methamphetamine, weighing between 4 and 200 grams including adulterants and dilutants (count I) and intentionally and knowingly possessing an immediate precursor, ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, with the intent to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine (count II). See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.102(6) (West Supp.2006), § 481.112(a), (d) (West 2003). The court assessed punishment at fifteen years’ confinement on count I and five…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Banda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Ashton Joel Carmen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Real Property Located at 4125 Blanton, Wichita Falls, Wichita County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.