Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 99, Calendar No. 36,569PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Earl H. Sackett left his home in Ecorse on the morning- of October 15, 1921, went to his work in a shop, worked until noon, left the shop, and has never been seen or heard of since. He owned a home and left a wife and five young children.

Plaintiff, the wife, beneficiary in a policy of life insurance, awaited the coming of the statutory presumption of death after absence of seven years (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13467), and brought suit on the policy and prevailed in a trial without a jury. Defendant has appealed and contends:

First: That the evidence does not show diligent search and inquiry,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Griffin v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Ledger v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hefford v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lompre v. VenetjokiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Frankowich v. FrankowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Albert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API