Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Fugatt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 9, 1937No. 25823PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Garfield county by Lula May Harrison against W. D. Fugatt to recover upon a promissory note executed by Fugatt, and to foreclose the lien" upon certain stock in the Federal Petroleum Company given by Fugatt as collateral security for said note. The petroleum company was brought into the action merely for purposes concerning certain alleged dividends accrued on said stock.
The parties are referred to herein as they appeared at the trial.
The alleged facts as disclosed by the pleadings and relied upon by plaintiff as a basis for recovery are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Oklahoma State Bank v. First Nat. Bank of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Orr v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Swartz v. Bank of HaileyvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- American Finance Corp. v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- National City Bank v. Erskine & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1953