Rochelle v. Anderson

The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, is a Creek Indian of one-thirty-second degree of Indian blood, and as such had allotted to her two noncontiguous tracts of land of 80 acres each, described as follows : The west half of the southwest quarter of section five and the east half of the southwest quarter of section seven, both in township nineteen north, range eight east. The latter 80 acres is the tract in controversy.

On October 27, 1922, plaintiff and' her husband, Walter W. Rochelle, went to the office of one Wortman, a lawyer in the city of Tulsa, where certain deeds were executed, one…