Legal Opinion
Alamo Refining Co. v. Shell Development Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 10, 1951No. Civ. 1065PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This action was commenced in September, ,1947 by an original complaint for declaratory judgment respecting the validity and infringement of patents said to “number in the hundreds” relating to fluid catalytic cracking processes. In 1948 the complaint was amended. All defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. I granted the motion as to Texaco and International for failure to indentify any patents of those defendants with the charge of infringement. The motions of Shell and Standard were granted for failure to allege any authority of agents to charge infringement.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Ackerman v. HookCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Caldwell Manufacturing Co. v. Unique Balance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Dr. Beck & Co. G.M.B.H. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Tubeco, Inc. v. Crippen Pipe Fabrication CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. Foster Grant Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- United Lacquer Mfg. Corp. v. Maas & Waldstein Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.