Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. Hook
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 16, 1950No. 10114PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
On motion, the Court below dismissed plaintiff’s action as against appellees on the ground of no jurisdiction.
In order to show the nature of appellant’s claims against the various defendants, we outline his amended complaint in detail. It alleges that Federal jurisdiction arises because of “diversity of citizenship and patents”. Plaintiff-appellant is a. citizen of New York. Defendant, Hook & Ackerman, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia. The individual defendants are citizens of that state. Appellees all reside in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Eskimo Pie Corporation v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Employers Insurance Of Wausau v. Crown Cork & Seal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Barnes, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.