Legal Opinion
Tubeco, Inc. v. Crippen Pipe Fabrication Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1975No. 73 C 203PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff (“Tubeco”) brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, seeking a declaratory judgment which would determine that defendants’ Patent No. 3,456,468 (1) is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed by Tubeco or its customers, (2) has been used in unfair competition with Tubeco, and (3) has been used as a false description or representation, and a false designation of origin of goods and services in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). 1 There being no diversity of citizenship between the parties, subject matter…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Paul A. Muller and Celfil Company Establishment v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Mirror Polishing & Plating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Spotless Enterprises, Inc. v. Carlisle Plastics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.