Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Weary v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 26, 2009No. 2008-KP-2673Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KNOLL, Justice,

dissenting in part and concurring in part from the granting of the writ.

| Relator was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death in March 2002. On April 24, 2006, this Court affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal1 and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 27, 2006.2 In December 2006, relator filed a “shell” application for post-conviction relief in the district court.3 The district court denied relator’s pro se application in February 2007. This Court, however, issued an order setting aside the district court’s ruling,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API