Legal Opinion

Rompilla v. Beard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 2005No. 04-5462PublishedCited by 1,702 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

This case calls for specific application of the standard of reasonable competence required on the part of defense counsel by the Sixth Amendment. We hold that even when a capital defendant’s family members and the defendant himself have suggested that no mitigating evidence is available, his lawyer is bound to make reasonable efforts to obtain and review material that counsel knows the prosecution will probably rely on as evidence of aggravation at the sentencing phase of trial.

I

On the morning of January 14, 1988, James Scanlon was discovered dead in a bar he ran in Allentown, Pennsylvania,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,702 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Wilson v. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

1,697 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API