Legal Opinion
Jelen & Son, Inc. v. Kaiser Steel Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1991No. 89CA1649PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PLANK.
Jelen & .Son, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment requiring a remote grantee to convey realty to Jelen while leaving certain intervening interests intact. We reverse.
The action was resolved upon undisputed facts. In 1977, Jelen conveyed an interest in specified mineral rights to Groves/Calder Joint Venture, a general partnership, by general warranty and quitclaim deeds. The pertinent language of the general warranty deed provides:
“1. IN CONSIDERATION of Ten Dollars ... Grantor hereby grants ... to Grantee, its successors and assigns, the entire interests in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Judd v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- School District No. Six in County of Weld v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Cowell v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1876
- Bledsoe v. HillColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cole v. COLORADO SPRINGS COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M.D.C./Wood, Inc. v. MortimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Board of County Commissioners v. O'DellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Allen v. NickersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Mortimer v. M.D.C./Wood, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993