Legal Opinion
Cole v. COLORADO SPRINGS COMPANY
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 22, 1963No. 20007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Frantz
Has the trial court pending before it a justiciable controversy when a party seeks to quiet the title to realty against which it is asserted there is a condition subsequent, although the condition has not as yet been violated, but which condition, it is alleged in a reply to the answer setting forth the existence of the condition subsequent, has been nullified and rendered ineffectual by certain conduct of the reversioner? This is the issue presented by this writ of error, and its affirmative resolution would require a reversal of this case.
Cole filed his suit to quiet the title to certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
- White v. KentlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Murphy v. TraynorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Cowell v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1876
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman, His Wife v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Prieskorn v. MaloofNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.