Legal Opinion

Binnian v. Jennings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1896No. 2102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by ■

Dunbar, J.

This action was brought by the appellant against defendant W. J. Jennings and respondent F. H. Whitworth, on a promissory note. Judgment *678was taken against Jennings on the pleadings. Whit-worth answered separately, admitting the execution of the note, but denying any indebtedness, and setting up as an affirmative defense that he signed as a surety only and that Binnian knew that he so signed, and that appellant Binnian and defendant Jennings had entered into an agreement for a valuable consideration for the extension of the time of payment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warburton v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Culbertson v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DukichWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Nelson v. FlaggWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bank of British Columbia v. JeffsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lipsett v. DetteringWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lazelle v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API