Legal Opinion

Bank of British Columbia v. Jeffs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1896No. 2187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. Thomas J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion, of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This action is based upon a promissory note executed by T. M. Alvord, his wife M. J. Alvord, E. H. Alvord and appellant Richard Jeffs, said note being for the sum of $10,000, made November 15, 1890, payable to the respondent, the Bank of British Columbia, one day thereafter, with interest after date at the rate of ten per cent. The action was brought against the appellant Jeffs alone.

The amended answer contains nine separate defenses, the first of which alleges that the sum for which said not wms given was loaned by the respondent to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ducker v. . RappNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Voss v. German American BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Starret v. BurkhalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Uniontown Bank v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bradley Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. HeyburnWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. First Nat. Bank of Midland v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Merriam v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bank of British Columbia v. JeffsWashington Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API