Lazelle v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
From Clackamas: Thor. A. McBride, Judge. Action on a note by Mary A. Lázelle and Ella C. Duncan against G-. R.- H. Miller and J. G. Pilsbury, in which plaintiffs had judgment and Miller appeal's.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
This is an action upon a promissory note for $300, of date April 2, 1889, executed by G. R. H. Miller and J. G. Pilsbury, and payable to J. K. Bingham one year after date. The complaint is in the usual form, alleging the execution of the note, certain payments thereon, the death of the payee, the admission of his will to probate, the title of plaintiffs to the note, and that there is due and unpaid thereon $267.50, with interest from October 2, 1895. Miller alone answered, and, after some admissions and denials, alleges affirmatively that at the time of the execution of the note he borrowed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Millerd v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- People's Bank v. PearsonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Savings Bank of Carroll v. DunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Gillman v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Condon Nat. Bank v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1911