Legal Opinion
Peake v. Azusa Valley Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1940No. Civ. No. 6320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J., pro tem.
In this action to quiet title the plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant.
The action was instituted by appellant to quiet title to the westerly 110 feet of lots 3 and 4, block B, of subdivision No. 1, of the lands of Azusa Land and Water Company, as per map recorded in book 16, page 17, Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County.
He claims title to the westerly 110 feet of lots 3 and 4 by virtue of a deed executed by Frank L. Dingman and Nettie L. Dingman, his wife.
Appellant alleges in his second cause of action that prior to November 12, 1927, Frank L.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Earl v. DutourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Montgomery v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Wegge v. MadlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Stockdale v. LesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Pierson v. BradfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Tomity Corp. v. SovkueffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sceirine v. DensmoreNevada Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.