Maidman v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint under subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the claims upon which plaintiff seeks recovery have been discharged by release.
The cause of action is for rent for the month of June, 1956, water charges and sewer rent for the same month pursuant to a written lease between the parties.
*149The defendant’s position is that the said claims were discharged by reason of a release executed and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. This plaintiff was involved in prior related litigation. He is the owner of the Beverly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Farrington v. Harlem Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Porter v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Construction of the Will of JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958