Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Rothschild

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from defendant’s negligence which injuries are alleged to have been received by plaintiff on January 9, 1935, while riding as a passenger in defendant’s motor vehicle.

A single cause of action is set up in the complaint to recover for all injuries resulting from the accident, immediate, temporary and permanent. The answer contains denials of every allegation of the complaint. As a separate defense and bar to the cause of action set up in the complaint, the answer contained allegations to the effect that, on March 15,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Fleming v. PonzianiNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Lerner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  5. Mix v. NeffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API