Legal Opinion

Porter v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1944PublishedCited by 38 opinions

I. Eeformation of a contract is improper where mistake is unilateral and no fraud exists. To warrant reformation mistake must be mutual. (Christopher St. B. Co. v. Si. B. Co., 149 Y. 51; Salomon v. North British & M. Ins. Co., 215 N. Y. 214; Metsger v. 2Etna Ins. Co., 227 N. Y. 411.) II. Evidence must be clear, positive and convincing before a contract can be rewritten by the court.

Read the full summary

I. Eeformation of a contract is improper where mistake is unilateral and no fraud exists. To warrant reformation mistake must be mutual. (Christopher St. B. Co. v. Si. B. Co., 149 Y. 51; Salomon v. North British & M. Ins. Co., 215 N. Y. 214; Metsger v. 2Etna Ins. Co., 227 N. Y. 411.) II. Evidence must be clear, positive and convincing before a contract can be rewritten by the court. Reformation is never granted upon a probability, nor even upon a mere preponderance evidence, but only upon a certainty of the error. (Salomon v. North British & M. Ins. Co., 215 N. Y. 214; Susquehanna S. S. Co.…

1Opinion of the CourtConwat, J.

The plaintiff was employed in 1936 as a dining room attendant in the Wassaic State School. After her employment she became a member of the New York State Civil Employee’s Association, hereinafter referred to as “ Association ”. The defendant, Commercial Casualty Insurance Co., hereinafter referred to as “ Company”, made an agreement under which, upon application of a member, it issued a policy of accident and health insurance under what is described in the record as a group plan as distinguished from a group insurance policy. The group plan was not introduced into evidence. Two members of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
  3. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API