Legal Opinion

Allen v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1959No. 38469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment-entered in condemnation proceedings instituted in May, 1957, by the City of Tulsa,, as plaintiff, to acquire, through its right of eminent domain, a certain parcel of real' estate belonging to plaintiffs in error (hereinafter referred to as defendants), for the-purpose of opening and extending a city-street across it. The subject property consists of a five-room house with two-rooim living quarters in a smaller separate structure behind it, both on a 8(7 x 10CK lot.

The property was appraised by two of' the three court-appointed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. City of Oklahoma City v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. WithersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Durell v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Lloyd v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Bailey v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API