Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 25, 1967No. 41005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIODGES, Justice.
Involved in this condemnation proceeding by the State of Oklahoma, through its Department of Plighways, is the taking of .77 of an acre, including all rights of access, together with all rights of access to and from certain existing highways upon which lands of the defendants abutted. The purpose of this acquisition was to accommodate the Broken Arrow Expressway in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
A trial by jury was waived by both parties and the cause was submitted to the trial judge who rendered judgment awarding the defendants damages in the amount of $15,-000.00. After the overruling of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AzureMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Gaylord v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- RIVERBEND LAND v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018