Legal Opinion
McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. Lorince
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 1972No. 43828, 43829PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Two condemnation proceedings were consolidated for trial and consolidated on appeal by order of this Court.
McAlester Urban Renewal Authority (plaintiff) commenced condemnation proceedings against appellees (defendants) to acquire defendants’ property for urban renewal purposes. A jury trial was had to determine the amount of damages defendants sustained by reason of the taking. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment rendered on the jury verdict.
In February, 1967, plaintiff adopted an urban development plan which was approved by the McAlester City Council. The plan was filed for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Lloyd v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Allen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Lamar Central Outdoor, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Stephens Production Co., a Division of SF Holding Corp. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.