People v. Marcroft
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, P. J.
We hold that a trial court may not, as an aid to settling a statement on appeal, engage in ex parte communications with a witness. A posttrial, off-the-record ex parte request that a witness restate his or her version of the facts in a memorandum to the court is clearly improper and must be disapproved. We find that a settled statement certified subsequent to the court’s receipt of such a communication so infects the integrity of the statement as to entitle the defendant to a new trial. In this case, due to the relatively minor nature of the infraction and the amount…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CarlucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. CornersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
- People v. WebsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. DragomirAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2005
- In re Inquiry Concerning WasilenkoState of California Commission On Judicial Performance · 2005
- Inquiry Concerning StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.