Legal Opinion

People v. Marcroft

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided April 16, 1992No. Crim. A. No. 7461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, P. J.

We hold that a trial court may not, as an aid to settling a statement on appeal, engage in ex parte communications with a witness. A posttrial, off-the-record ex parte request that a witness restate his or her version of the facts in a memorandum to the court is clearly improper and must be disapproved. We find that a settled statement certified subsequent to the court’s receipt of such a communication so infects the integrity of the statement as to entitle the defendant to a new trial. In this case, due to the relatively minor nature of the infraction and the amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CarlucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. CornersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  4. People v. WebsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DragomirAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2005
  2. In re Inquiry Concerning WasilenkoState of California Commission On Judicial Performance · 2005
  3. Inquiry Concerning StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API