Legal Opinion

Inquiry Concerning Stanford

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2012No. 190Published

1Opinion of the Court

*CJP Supp. 5Opinion

McCONNELL, Chairperson.

I

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge Richard W. Stanford, Jr., a judge of the Orange County Superior Court since 1998, and a judge of the Orange County Municipal Court from 1985 to 1998. The Commission on Judicial *CJP Supp. 6Performance commenced this inquiry with the filing of its notice of formal proceedings (Notice) on April 7, 2011.

The Notice charges Judge Stanford with a pattern of diverting to his own court and acting on traffic tickets on behalf of his son-in-law, friends, and a juror over a seven-year period,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Adams v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Furey v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API