People v. Jenkins
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALARCON, J.
This court has been required to reverse or remand an increasing number of matters, not on the merits of appellants’ contentions but due solely to the failure of settled statements on appeal to reflect what transpired before the trial court. Failure to prepare a proper settled statement results in unnecessary expense to the taxpayer and inconvenience to the litigants. In a traffic infraction case, for example, the loss of worktime and income incident to new proceedings in the trial court may cause a defendant unjustly convicted to abandon his appeal. In the hope that a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- March v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. DiSandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. MarcroftAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
- Wolf v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ace Beverage Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.