People v. Dragomir
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALSH, J.
A. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Alin T. Dragomir was cited for speeding. He requested a trial. At trial, where neither appellant nor the respondent was represented by counsel, *Supp. 3both the citing officer and appellant testified. After appellant presented his testimony, the court, over appellant’s objection, allowed the officer to cross-examine appellant. Appellant was convicted of speeding and was fined.
In the published portion of this opinion, we agree with appellant that it was error for the trial court to allow him to be cross-examined by the officer, whose only proper role…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. CarlucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. MarcroftAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. DragomirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005