Legal Opinion

In re Obringer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 21, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney-disciplinary ease. Respondent was admitted to the bar of New Jersey in 1982. At the time of the alleged offenses he practiced in Marlton, New Jersey where he specialized *77in bankruptcy law. The Office of Attorney Ethics filed a complaint charging respondent with knowingly misappropriating escrow funds contrary to RPC 1.15, knowingly making a false statement to a tribunal contrary to RPC 3.3(a)(1), and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation contrary to RPC 8.4(c).

A Special Master conducted a hearing on behalf of District XIV Ethics…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. In Re PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API