Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Pena

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 2000Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

I disagree with the Court’s determination to disbar respondents Angel Pena and Glenn Rocca. I have reached this conclusion by traveling a different route than the other members of this Court. My reasoning is set forth in my concurring opinion in In re Litwin, 104 N.J. 362, 370, 517 A.2d 378 (1986).

When I joined the Court in 1981, one of the most difficult cases of that term was In re Hughes, 90 N.J. 32, 446 A.2d 1208 (1982). Hughes had been unable to clear up a federal tax lien on real estate in his father’s estate. To save his mother embarrassment, he offered a bribe to a federal agent to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API