Legal Opinion

In Re Pena

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

753 A.2d 633 (2000)

164 N.J. 222

In the Matter of Angel R. PENA, an Attorney at Law.

In the Matter of Glenn M. Rocca, an Attorney at Law.

In the Matter of Michael S. Ahl, an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 1999.

Decided May 12, 2000.

Tangerla Mitchell Thomas, Deputy Ethics Counsel, on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Anthony P. Ambrosio, Bloomfield, for respondent Angel R. Pena (Ambrosio, Kyreakakis, DiLorenzo, Moraff & McKenna, attorneys; Enid W. McDonough, Brooklyn, NY, on the brief).

Eric A. Summerville, Jersey City, for respondent Glenn M. Rocca…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API