Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Erwood
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*90Justice PLEICONES.
We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeals holding invalid, as against public policy, a provision in an automobile insurance policy purporting to limit the portability of basic uninsured motorist (UM) coverage. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Erwood, 364 S.C. 1, 611 S.E.2d 319 (Ct.App. 2005). We affirm.
FACTS
Erwood was a passenger on an uninsured motorcycle owned and driven by her husband when he had an accident. Er-wood’s husband was at-fault in the accident. • Erwood owned an automobile insured by Nationwide under a policy providing $15,000 in UM…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Burgess v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ErwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ErwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Progressive Direct Insurance Co. v.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.