Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Calcutt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 2000No. 3159PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Judge:

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action to construe the provisions of an automobile insurance policy. At issue is whether State Farm, Mayo Rudy Calcutt’s underinsurance carrier, may offset workers’ compensation benefits Calcutt may receive. The trial judge held the policy clause providing for a setoff of workers’ compensation benefits conflicted with applicable underinsured motorist coverage statutes and violated public policy. We reverse.

FACTS

On March 31, 1994, Calcutt was injured in a motor vehicle accident while operating his employer’s vehicle within the course…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Torrington Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Antley v. Nobel InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. PrioleauCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Goldston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Kay v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API