Sholar v. Barker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This appeal is taken by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in a wrongful death action following a non jury trial. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived and no motion for a new trial was made. Appellant presents only two assignments of error for our consideration: (1) that the evidence does not support the judgment; and (2) that the judgment is excessive in amount.
The second assignment of error deserves no consideration for the reason that it long has been a settled rule in Cali fornia that the point that damages are excessive cannot be raised for the first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rawlins v. LoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Harlow v. Van DusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Roche v. CasissaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Strnod v. AbadieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Costa v. A. S. Upson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sanders Construction Co. v. San Joaquin First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.