Legal Opinion

Sholar v. Barker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1962No. Civ. 26287PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

This appeal is taken by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in a wrongful death action following a non jury trial. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived and no motion for a new trial was made. Appellant presents only two assignments of error for our consideration: (1) that the evidence does not support the judgment; and (2) that the judgment is excessive in amount.

The second assignment of error deserves no consideration for the reason that it long has been a settled rule in Cali fornia that the point that damages are excessive cannot be raised for the first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. LoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Harlow v. Van DusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Roche v. CasissaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Strnod v. AbadieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Costa v. A. S. Upson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Sanders Construction Co. v. San Joaquin First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API