Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Van Dusen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1955No. Civ. 20976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The administratrix of the estate of Neal Calvin Oxford, deceased, is here appealing from a judgment, after trial by jury, in favor of the respondents, awarding damages for the deaths of respondents’ husbands and fathers, respectively, which occurred while the latter were riding as guests in a Studebaker automobile driven by Neal Oxford, deceased. The action herein is based upon the theory of wilful misconduct on the part of Neal Oxford who, along with the two guests Francis Harlow and Marco Piscitelli, died as a result of the accident.

The accident happened when the car, of which the three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hastings v. SerletoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Hallman v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Francesconi v. BelluominiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Jones v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Meyer v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Newing v. CheathamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API