Legal Opinion

Rexroad v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1896No. 64PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Reno district court; L. Houk, judge. Action in replevin by John Rex-road against H. N. Johnson, as constable of the city of Hutchinson. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, J.:

This action was, on October 12,1895, revived by this court in the name of the heirs at law of John Rexroad, deceased. The defendant in error questions the right of the heirs of John Rexroad to have the action revived in their name. An exami*334nation of tlie record reveals the fact that this is an action in replevin, brought by Rexroad to recover the possession of specific personal property, alleged to have been wrongfully detained from him by the defendant in error, H. N. Johnson. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant Johnson, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Presbury v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glazier Ex Rel. Estate of Glazier v. HeneybussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Jersak v. Risen, Ex'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Thompson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API