Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Lotton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1889No. 13,653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant alleges in his complaint that he is the owner in fee of the land in controversy; that the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully withholds possession, to the appellant’s damage in the sum of one hundred *2dollars. The appellee’s answer, omittting the formal parts, is in these words: “ The defendant disclaims any interest in the land of the plaintiff as described in his complaint.” To this answer the appellant unsuccessfully demurred.

The answer is a disclaimer. It does not, however, do more than disclaim a present interest, for it does not assert that at the time the action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarnan v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Noe v. CardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Ragan v. HaynesIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Dobbins v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hill v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Miller v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Thompson v. KreisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Stowers v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. Scobey v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API