McAdams v. Lotton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Ohio Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant alleges in his complaint that he is the owner in fee of the land in controversy; that the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully withholds possession, to the appellant’s damage in the sum of one hundred *2dollars. The appellee’s answer, omittting the formal parts, is in these words: “ The defendant disclaims any interest in the land of the plaintiff as described in his complaint.” To this answer the appellant unsuccessfully demurred.
The answer is a disclaimer. It does not, however, do more than disclaim a present interest, for it does not assert that at the time the action was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCarnan v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Noe v. CardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Ragan v. HaynesIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Dobbins v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hill v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Thompson v. KreisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Stowers v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Scobey v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894