Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kreisher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1897No. 18,007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellee in two paragraphs of complaint. The first, in the usual form, to quiet the title to real estate, and the second, in the usual form, for possession, and damages for the wrongful detention of said real estate. The appellee answered the first paragraph of complaint by disclaiming any interest or estate in said property; and he answered the second paragraph by disclaiming “any estate or interest in the real estate,” and by denying that he then, or within six years thertofore, held possession of said real estate or any part thereof.

A trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Butler University v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hammann v. MinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McCarnan v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Physio-Medical College v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nutter v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. RouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Studabaker v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hofferbert v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Indiana Rolling Mill Co. v. Gas Supply & Mining Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API