Legal Opinion

Walker v. Steele

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1889No. 11,961PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

— The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the court below, instituted this action to set aside the transfer of a certain note and mortgage, and to recover the same as a part of the assets of the said estate.

The appellees John Steele and Franklin Steele, filed an answer, which they styled a disclaimer ,• Samuel Steele, Jr., who is an infant, and Franklin Steele, in his capacity as guardian of the said Samuel Steele, Jr., answered by a general denial.

There was a jury trial, and a verdict returned for the appellees.

*438The appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which the court overruled, and he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Ashwell v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Huber v. Protestant Deaconess Hospital, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Baker v. State Bank of AkronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API