Legal Opinion

Miller v. Curry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1890No. 14,228PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant’s complaint contains several paragraphs; the first is to quiet title, and the others allege that the appellant executed to Amos Curry, in his lifetime, an instrument, in form a deed, but which was in fact a mortgage. Elizabeth Curry, Mary Studabaker and Edwin R. Wilson filed an answer disclaiming any interest in the real estate in controversy, and alleging that they had never claimed any right, title to, or interest in it.

It is asserted by appellant’s counsel that the court erred in overruling her demurrer to these answers, but counsel are in error. If it is true, as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Voss v. EllerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Gaskell v. ViquesneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Catterlin v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. McAdams v. LottonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wise v. LaymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Loeb v. McAlisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API