Legal Opinion
Young v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 17, 2004No. 29257-2-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 P.3d 927 (2004)
Thomas J. YOUNG and Carolyn L. Young, Appellants,
v.
PIERCE COUNTY, Respondent.
No. 29257-2-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
February 17, 2004.
Eric Rolf Stahlfeld, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Jill Guernsey, Pierce Co. Prosecutors Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
SEINFELD, J.
Thomas and Carolyn Young appeal a Pierce County land use ruling that applied wetland regulations to an "area" of their property and denied them an agricultural exemption. They contend that (1) the word "area" is unconstitutionally vague; (2) the County failed to show that the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Griffin v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Griffin v. Thurston County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- East County Reclamation Co. v. BjornsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- East County Reclamation Co. v. BjornsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.