Legal Opinion
East County Reclamation Co. v. Bjornsen
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 25, 2005No. 30109-1-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
fl — Nancy Bjornsen and Gene English appeal the superior court’s reversal of a Clark County Land Use Hearing Examiner’s decision that found inadequate the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) filed by East County Reclamation Company (East). East filed the FEIS to assess the impact of their proposal to build a landfill in eastern Clark County over an alluvial aquifer. The superior court reversed the hearing examiner’s decision, finding that he had relied on speculative reasoning and added requirements not provided in the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW.
Quinn-Bri…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Suquamish Tribe v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUNDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Suquamish Tribe v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010